3 Replies Latest reply on Apr 2, 2013 9:15 AM by levi

    Link Aggregation between 1638 and ProCurve

    ddpg New Member

      I'm trying to setup a trunk link between a 1638 and a ProCurve 8200zl using link aggregation.  When I setup the link aggregation, everything shows as being up, but I cannot pass traffic between the two switches.  Port-channel 1 shows that it is up and has a speed of 2000.  If I remove the link aggregation config from both switches and setup one of the ports on the 1638 as a trunk port, it works fine.

       

      Here is what I have on the 1638 side:

       

      interface port-channel 1

        no shutdown

        switchport mode trunk

        switchport trunk allowed vlan 1,64,128

      !

      interface gigabit-switchport 0/47

        no shutdown

        switchport mode trunk

        channel-group 1 mode on

      !

      interface gigabit-switchport 0/48

        no shutdown

        switchport mode trunk

        channel-group 1 mode on

      !

       

      And on the ProCurve:

       

      trunk A7-A8 Trk2 Trunk

      vlan 64

         untagged A3

         ip helper-address 10.9.0.18

         ip address 10.9.64.1 255.255.255.0

         tagged B20,Trk1-Trk2

         ip igmp

         exit

      vlan 128

         ip address 10.9.128.1 255.255.255.0

         tagged B20-B22,Trk1-Trk2

         exit

       

      Any ideas as to what I'm doing wrong?

        • Re: Link Aggregation between 1638 and ProCurve
          levi Employee

          ddpg:

           

          Thank you for asking this question in the support community.  The ADTRAN configuration appears to be correct for a link-aggregation setup.  However, unfortunately, I can't provide many recommendations on the HP ProCurve configuration, other than I believe they are in LACP Passive mode by default (which the ADTRAN does not support).  Here is the Link Aggregation Control Protocol in AOS guide for reference.  Additional items to check are:  Does the port-channel show UP on both units?  Are both units allowing the proper VLANs over the port-channel?

           

          Please, let me know if you have any additional information or questions.  I will be happy to help in any way I can.

           

          Levi

          • Re: Link Aggregation between 1638 and ProCurve
            levi Employee

            ddpg:

             

            Do you have any additional questions on this topic?  I will be happy to help in any way I can.

             

            Levi

            • Re: Link Aggregation between 1638 and ProCurve
              levi Employee

              ddpg:

               

              I went ahead and flagged the "Correct Answer" on this post to make it more visible and help other members of the community find solutions more easily. If you don't feel like the answer I marked was correct, feel free to come back to this post and unmark it and select another in its place with the applicable buttons.  If you still need assistance, we would be more than happy to continue working with you on this - just let us know in a reply.

               

              Thanks,

               

              Levi